With a fully insured plan you pay a fixed premium and the carrier carries all the claims risk. With
a level funded plan you pay a fixed monthly amount covering expected claims, administration and
stop-loss coverage, and you may get money back if your group’s claims come in low. Fully
insured is the most predictable. Level funded can be cheaper for a younger, healthier group and
carries more variability.
Fully insured Level funded
What you pay Fully insuredOne premium, no surprises Level fundedA steady monthly amount, split between expected claims, admin and stop-loss
Claims risk Fully insuredThe carrier carries all the claims risk Level fundedStop-loss insurance caps your exposure
Money back Fully insuredNo interest in what your claims actually looked like Level fundedSome of the claims fund can come back at the end of the year
Claims data Fully insuredRarely given at this size Level fundedYou get claims data, which makes future negotiation possible
Suits Fully insuredMost groups under about 25 lives, and any employer whose cash flow can’t take a bad quarter Level fundedA younger, healthier group whose owner is comfortable with some year-to-year variability
Fully insured
The traditional arrangement. One premium, no surprises, and no interest in what your claims
actually looked like. It’s the right answer for most groups under about 25 lives, and for
any employer whose cash flow can’t take a bad quarter.
Level funded
You pay a steady monthly amount, but underneath it your dollars are split between expected claims,
admin and stop-loss insurance that caps your exposure. If your group uses less than expected, some
of the claims fund can come back at the end of the year. If it uses more, the stop-loss picks it
up. You also get claims data, which fully insured plans rarely give you at this size, and that
data is what makes future negotiation possible.
It suits a younger, healthier group whose owner is comfortable with some year-to-year variability.
It’s not free money, and we’ll say so.
Captives, and when they make sense
A captive pools several employers together so they share risk and buy stop-loss as a block.
Whether one makes sense comes down to size and risk. The larger your employee population, the more
predictable your claims become, because of the law of large numbers. Under about 500 employees a
group usually isn’t big enough to absorb a bad claims year, so we generally don’t
recommend one. Once you reach the 500+ range, there’s generally enough claims volume to make
a self-funded or captive arrangement more predictable, and that’s when we’d absolutely
recommend looking into one.
Below that size, the things people actually want from a captive are tighter cost control, a look
at their own claims history, and the chance of money back at the end of the year. You can get all
three from a level funded plan without owning the risk. That’s the route we take.
HRA-based approaches
Pairing a higher deductible plan with an employer-funded HRA lets you buy a cheaper plan and then
cushion the first layer of employee cost yourself. Done well it lowers total spend without the
team feeling it. Done carelessly it just moves cost onto your people.
We quote across these, put them next to each other with real numbers, and explain the trade-off in
each. We don’t have a house preference.